The seemingly innocuous world of ice cream has become embroiled in a significant controversy in China, centered around the brand Zhong Xue Gao (中雪高), often dubbed the "Hermès of ice cream" for its premium pricing and luxurious branding. The company, known for its high-end ice cream products that reportedly defy melting, has found itself at the center of a firestorm following comments made by its founder, Lin Shengyi (林盛益), defending the brand's pricing and production methods. This incident has sparked a wider debate about consumer expectations, corporate responsibility, and the ethics of luxury branding in a rapidly developing market like China.
The "Hermès of ice cream" moniker is not a self-bestowed title. Zhong Xue Gao's branding and marketing actively cultivate an image of exclusivity and high quality, mirroring the luxury brand Hermès. The ice cream is packaged in elegant containers, often featuring sophisticated designs, and the price point reflects this aspirational image. A single stick of Zhong Xue Gao ice cream can cost upwards of 60 RMB (approximately $8 USD), significantly higher than the average price of ice cream in China. This premium pricing, coupled with claims of superior quality and innovative formulations that prevent melting, has attracted a dedicated – and increasingly critical – customer base.
The controversy erupted not from a sudden drop in quality, but from a response to consumer complaints regarding the ice cream's price and perceived value. Videos circulating online showed Zhong Xue Gao ice cream seemingly resisting melting under high temperatures, leading to accusations of using excessive stabilizers and other additives to achieve this effect. These videos fueled existing concerns about the brand's hefty price tag, with many consumers questioning whether the quality justified the cost. Lin Shengyi's subsequent defense of the company's practices, rather than appeasing critics, further inflamed the situation. His comments, perceived by many as arrogant and dismissive of consumer concerns, ignited a wave of public outrage.
The specific nature of Lin Shengyi's remarks varies depending on the source, but the common thread is a defense of Zhong Xue Gao's high prices, often citing the use of high-quality ingredients and sophisticated production techniques. This defense, however, failed to resonate with a public increasingly wary of corporate explanations for inflated pricing. The perceived disconnect between the company's claims and the realities of its product led to a significant backlash, with many consumers feeling misled and exploited. The incident highlights a growing trend in China where consumers are demanding greater transparency and accountability from brands, especially those positioned in the luxury market.
The “Hermes of ice cream not melting” phenomenon, as it’s become known online, isn't merely about the melting point of the ice cream. It's a symbol of a larger societal issue: the growing disparity between wealth and affordability in China. The ability of a seemingly simple product like ice cream to resist melting under extreme conditions becomes a representation of a brand's ability to resist scrutiny and criticism. The high price, combined with the perceived artificial resistance to melting, has become a lightning rod for criticism of the wider consumer culture in China.
current url：https://vjehol.e538c.com/guide/hermes-ice-cream-china-7859